The Accountability Levels of Saudi Arabia towards United Nations Mechanisms (2009-2016)
نویسندگان: ثبت نشده
چکیده مقاله:
The Human Rights Council (HRC) is one of the sub-bodies of the UN General Assembly, whose duty is to point out human rights violation cases and promote the accountability of states in this regard. The UPR is the most important monitoring tools of the HRC with the aim of monitoring, promotion and protection of human rights in all states and based on dialogue and cooperation, and is based on reliable and targeted information and equal treatment of all states. With the use of this mechanism and based on an organized program, the commitment of all countries of the world be reviewed and assessed. Now to what level this process has been able to affect the accountability levels of Saudi Arabia is not something that can be clearly answered in the first place. With a review of Saudi Arabia’s performance between the first and second rounds its UPR, the accountability levels of this country towards human rights bodies of the UN can be studied. For this purpose a review of the commitment levels of this country on the basis of its accepted recommendations in the first and second round of the UPR has been scrutinized in this article. With attention to conducted researches it seems that the promotion of human rights and increasing Saudi Arabia’s accountability to human rights mechanisms, further than standardization, the international community needs to guarantee the implementation and make Saudi Arabia to be accountable in observation of human rights principles, and to show commitment level, can increase the speculation of the tool usage of these mechanisms for the purpose of the presentation of the unreal human rights picture. The establishment of universal mechanisms for the protection of human rights, overall, must deemed as a positive step and hope that what is called the “Universal Periodic Review”, can be seen as the accountability of states to international bodies.
منابع مشابه
A Comparative Study on United Nations E-Government Indicators between Saudi Arabia and USA
E-government has a significant impact on the performance of public sector as a result continuous growth has been seen in the e-governments development around the world since last two decades. This paper investigates the e-government development scenario in Saudi Arabia and to compare it with the USA. The study is based on the e-government survey reports conducted by the United Nations between 2...
متن کاملInfluence on Saudi Arabia
"Broadcast" theory is one of the common theories explaining how phenomena and ideas spread. It is used by researchers in different fields of study. Having studied broadcast theory and its different components, this article tries to represent whether Islamic revolution of Iran has exerted influence on Saudi Arabia. And if positive, how it has influenced and how much it has been. The results sug...
متن کاملAnalyzing the Best Choice of Qatar Foreign Policy Towards Iran and Saudi Arabia in the Framework of Game theory
Since developments of the Arab world in 2011, Qatar has sought to introduce itself an important regional actor. Qatar's desire to engage in regional equations has contrasted with the policies of traditional actors such as Iran and Saudi Arabia. These paper tries to explain Qatar's foreign policy toward its regional rivals, Iran and Saudi Arabia, through statistical and mathematical data, by lin...
متن کاملLow Levels of Chlamydia Trachomatis Isolation from Patients of Obstetrics and Midwifery in Saudi Arabia
کلامیدیا یکی از علل عمده عفونت های ادراری - تناسلی در سراسر دنیا می باشد. عفونت ناشی از این ارگانیسم به طور متداول در کلینک های زنان و مامایی یافت می شود. جداسازی بوسیله کشت بافت، طریق استاندارد و بسیار حساسی جهت اثبات این عفونت می باشد هر چند که توسط روش های مستقیم تعیین آنتی ژن با استفاده از ایمونوفلورسنت یا تعیین عیار آنزیم سرمی و اخیراً نیز بوسیله بررسی ژنتیکی با تکنیک واکنش زنجیره پلیمراز ت...
متن کاملAttitudes towards informed consent: a comparison between surgeons working in saudi arabia and the United kingdom.
OBJECTIVES Changes in legal standing and new guidelines for consent have generated changes in medical culture that doctors must adhere to. This study aims to highlight the differences in the way the surgeons in the two cultures view the informed consent for surgery processes. METHODS The attitudes towards informed consent of a group of surgeons working in Saudi Arabia (KSA) were compared with...
متن کاملمنابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ذخیره در منابع من قبلا به منابع من ذحیره شده{@ msg_add @}
عنوان ژورنال
دوره 7 شماره 1
صفحات 1- 9
تاریخ انتشار 2017-06-01
با دنبال کردن یک ژورنال هنگامی که شماره جدید این ژورنال منتشر می شود به شما از طریق ایمیل اطلاع داده می شود.
کلمات کلیدی
میزبانی شده توسط پلتفرم ابری doprax.com
copyright © 2015-2023